Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry
28 September 2018
Executive Summary
...[F]inancial services entities...has brought public attention and condemnation.
...[T]his Interim Report these questions – ‘why’ and ‘what now’....
...Banks, and all financial services entities recognised that they sold services and products. Selling became their focus of attention. Too often it became the sole focus of attention.
...When misconduct was revealed, it either went unpunished or the consequences did not meet the seriousness of what had been done. The conduct regulator, ASIC, rarely went to court to seek public denunciation of and punishment for misconduct. The prudential regulator, APRA, never went to court....
...Should the existing law be administered or enforced differently? Is different enforcement what is needed to have entities apply basic standards of fairness and honesty: by obeying the law; not misleading or deceiving; acting fairly; providing services that are fit for purpose; delivering services with reasonable care and skill; and, when acting for another, acting in the best interests of that other? The basic ideas are very simple. Should the law be simplified to reflect those ideas better?
This Interim Report seeks to identify, and gather together...the questions that have come out of the Commission’s work so far....