abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube
Lawsuit (SLAPP)

Sonia Jeannette Sanchez Perez - Women’s Movement of Santo Tomás

Status: DISMISSED

Date lawsuit was filed
29 Jun 2017
Date accuracy
All Correct
Sonia Jeannette Sanchez Perez
Criminal
Female
Women’s Movement of Santo Tomás
Affected community's leader or member
Lawsuits: SLAPPs
Legal claims: Defamation, Slander
Amount of damages: $25.000
Lawsuit Brought By: Company
Target: Individual
Location of Filing: El Salvador
Location of Incident: El Salvador
Grupo Poma El Salvador Construction, Property development, Automobile & other motor vehicles, Hotel
Grupo Roble (part of Grupo Poma) El Salvador Construction, Property development Company Response

Sources

On 29 September 2015, Grupo Roble filed a complaint against Sonia Sánchez, a human rights defender in El Salvador. The company accused her of defamation and slander in relation to remarks the human rights defender had made on three television stations (Channel 33, Channel10, and TVX) and National Radio and asked her to pay 25000 dollars and make publicly apologize to the company. Sonia had spoken about the environmental damage caused by Inversiones Roble's projects. For instance, the company cut 28 hectares of forest to build 426 exclusive homes in the municipality of Santo Tomás, despite the disagreement of the local community. On 23 August 2016, the Isidro Menéndez court acquitted Sonia Sánchez because the prosecution failed to prove that the human rights defender intended to damage the company's reputation and its legal representative