abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

The content is also available in the following languages: 日本語

Article

27 Jun 2024

Author:
Initiative for Global Solidarity

Study reveals persistent "remedy gap" in grievance mechanisms within mineral supply chains

"New Publication: Study on Grievance Mechanisms to promote Human Rights in the Mining Industry", 27 June 2024

"Mining activities can cause wide-ranging and complex impacts on human rights of workers, the local populations as well as the rights of communities, including indigenous people’s rights. Effective and accessible grievance mechanisms play a critical role in managing social and environmental risks and ensuring the fulfilment of rights and well-being of affected communities, including their access to remedy...

In this context the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, in collaboration with the GIZ Sector Programme “Extractives and Development” and the “Initiative for Global Solidarity” commissioned a study to analyse the effectiveness of existing grievance mechanisms in mineral supply chains providing access to remedy for rightsholders in large-scale mining...

One of the key findings clearly shows that the so-called “remedy gap” persists: despite a variety of grievance mechanisms being available at national and international level, there are significant challenges for right holders in terms of access and effectiveness in regard to grievance channels and remedial measures. This includes a lack of awareness about the potentially available grievance mechanisms, but also financial, technical, linguistic, cultural and gender barriers to access those. When human rights violations have taken place, affected persons are often faced with the difficulty to provide proof of evidence which requires substantial legal know-how or financial support. Moreover, when remedy measures are determined they often do not meet the requirements by those who have been affected...

For the full version of the study and the summary of recommendations, please see the study document here."

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.