You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

[PDF] Free Speech and Freedom of Association: Finding the Balance - A Position Paper

Author: Intl. Trade Union Confederation, Published on: 1 June 2013

[Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited Delta Air Lines and Deutsche Telekom to respond to this paper; see responses below.] The fundamental right to freedom of association guarantees that workers are able to form and join trade unions free from any interference from employers and governments...[The] International Organisation of Employers (IOE) is now attempting to undermine that principle by arguing, in the name of freedom of expression, that anti-union campaigns meant to discourage workers from forming or joining a union are consistent with international standards...[and] that anti-union campaigns may be an obligation of employers...[The] IOE relies heavily on a contorted interpretation of a 2010 decision by the ILO...concerning Delta Airlines’ campaign to encourage workers to “shred” their union election ballots...[The] IOE had previously conceded that U.S.-style anti-union campaigns violate the right to freedom of association as established by the ILO. The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) recognizes that employers and workers have a right to express themselves; however,...[the] limit must be drawn...[at] interference with the right to association...[V]itriolic anti-union U.S.-based employers cross that line...[Labour] laws like those found in the U.S. are outliers...permitting anti-union speech that is illegal (and unthinkable) elsewhere... [Includes case study on Deutsche Telekom, T-Mobile (part of Deutsche Telekom). Also refers to Littler Mendelson, Pelephone (part of Bezeq)]

Read the full post here

Related companies: Bezeq Delta Air Lines Deutsche Telekom Pelephone (part of Bezeq) T-Mobile (part of Deutsche Telekom)