hide message

Welcome to the Resource Centre

We make it our mission to work with advocates in civil society, business and government to address inequalities of power, seek remedy for abuse, and ensure protection of people and planet.

Both companies and impacted communities thank us for the resources and support we provide.

This is only possible because of your support. Please make a donation today.

Thank you,
Phil Bloomer, Executive Director

Donate now hide message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

[PDF] Hoffman v South African Airways [case analysis]

Author: Equal Rights Trust, Published on: 28 September 2000

The appellant, Hoffman, was HIV positive. In September 1996 he applied for employment as a cabin attendant with South African Airways (SAA)… he was deemed 'unsuitable' due to the HIV positive test. He challenged the constitutionality of the refusal to employ him on the basis that it was unfair dismissal and violated his constitutional right to equality...and fair labour practices. The Court set out that those living with HIV, including the appellant, were a vulnerable minority treated with intense prejudice by society…The Court held that the appellant, having been denied employment solely because of his HIV status should be entitled to the fullest redress…

Read the full post here

Related companies: South African Airways