You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:
[PDF] Liu Bo Shan v China Construction Bank Corporation - Summary Order [USA]
Author: US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Published on: 5 May 2011
Liu Bo Shan appeals…against his former employer, defendant China Construction Bank…, for torture in violation of the Torture Victim Protection Act [TVPA]…and…the Alien Tort Statute [ATS]… Because [the court] conclude that Liu fails to state a claim against the Bank for the alleged violations of customary international law under either a direct or accessorial theory of liability, [the Court does] not address the Bank’s arguments (1) that the claims are time-barred; (2) that cruel treatment and prolonged arbitrary detention are not actionable under the ATS; or (3) that a TVPA claim may only be brought against a natural person, not a corporation. [The court has] considered Liu’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit…[T]he district court’s judgment is affirmed.