abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube
Article

24 Oct 2017

Author:
Save Lamu Campaign, in Greenpeace Africa (So. Africa)

So. Africa's Standard Bank will not finance Kenya coal project opposed by activists due to potential negative impacts

"Standard Bank Sets The Record Straight on Financing Lamu"

South Africa's Standard Bank has stated they will not fund the proposed Lamu coal-fired power plant in Kenya. This comes despite reports that they were a major project funder, as included in the bank’s annual report of 2015. This is good news for the Lamu people and the deCOALonize Kenya campaign who have been at the forefront of the contentious court battle against the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA). The environmental impacts of the Lamu coal plant have been underplayed, particularly the plant's contribution to climate change. The controversial decision to build the 1,050 Megawatt coal-fired thermal power plant will have dire consequences, not only for Lamu County, but for the whole country. “The fact that a major African bank refuses to fund this deadly plant sends a strong anti-coal message amidst financiers increasing unease when funding coal globally. Any investment in coal is a disaster for the planet. Financiers are aware of the poor financial return of these projects, especially in comparison to renewable energy projects.” warned Omar Elmawi from the​ ​deCOALonize​ ​Kenya​ ​campaign​.

Standard Bank states they reviewed the opportunity to fund the plant, but for “various reasons” decided against it. This was confirmed by Nigel Beck, Head of Environmental and Social Advisory​ ​at​ ​Standard​ ​Bank. “This is a wise decision on behalf of Standard Bank,” said Glen Tyler, 350 South Africa Team Leader. “Building a coal plant near a UNESCO World Heritage Site will attract continued protests from the people it will impact. We have seen how shortcuts taken by prospective independent coal power producers in South Africa in accounting for their impacts have been exposed. These will ultimately raise the price tag of the plants - investing in coal is not a good financial decision."

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.