abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube
Article

8 Nov 2019

Author:
3bility Consulting, FIANT Consulting Oy

Study analyses human rights performance of 50 largest Finnish companies using CHRB Core Indicators

November 2019

This study has utilized the methodology of [...] the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark for analysing the human rights performance of the 50 largest listed companies in Finland (excluding finance and insurance sector actors)...

A great majority of the assessed companies had made at least a general level commitment to respect human rights in their business operations. However, the assessment results indicate that bringing this commitment into practice through systematic human rights due diligence processes is still, overall, at a very early stage...

The assessment results indicate that still a majority of the assessed companies lack clear processes for assessing their human rights risks and impacts. This is directly reflected in the low share of companies reporting on actions taken to address and integrate human rights impact assessment results in their organizations’ processes and practices and with concerned external stakeholders, as well as the very low share of companies providing any information on monitoring the effectiveness of these actions as a core element of the human rights due diligence process. These clear gaps in, and in many cases even lack of human rights due diligence processes are directly reflected in poor grievance channels and mechanisms, as well as lack of information provided on remedying adverse impacts...

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.