Hide Message

Updating the Resource Centre Digital Platform

The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre is at a critical point in its development. Our digital platform is home to a wealth of information on business and human rights, but hasn’t had a visual refresh for a number of years.

We will soon be updating the site to improve its usability and better serve the thousands of people that use our site to support their work.

Please take an advance peek at our new look, and let us know what you think!

Thank you,
Alex Guy, Digital Officer

Find Out More Hide Message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:
en/appeals-court-in-ecuador-upholds-18-billion-judgment-against-chevron-in-environmental-pollution-lawsuit#c63124

[subscription or single article-payment required] Reversal of Fortune - A crusading lawyer helped Ecuadorans secure a huge environmental judgment against Chevron. But did he go too far?

Author: Patrick Radden Keefe, New Yorker, Published on: 4 January 2012

[Lawyer Steven] Donziger [for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Chevron] has maintained that Chevron is motivated not merely by fear of an adverse judgment but by a desire “to destroy the very idea that indigenous people can bring an environmental lawsuit against an oil company.”…[A] local man named Donald Moncayo showed me around...At one fetid pit...he stepped gingerly onto the surface of the pool, where the solid matter in the produced water [resulting from oil drilling] had congealed into a tar-like crust...According to the plaintiffs, there are nearly a thousand of these pits in the Oriente...Chevron [has] declared the [eighteen billion dollar] judgment [against it] to be “illegitimate and unenforceable,” and said that the company, which has no assets in Ecuador, would not pay…As Randy Mastro [partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher representing Chevron] sees it, the for-profit players who are bankrolling Donziger’s efforts betray an underlying cynicism behind the plaintiff’s case. This suit is driven not by poor Ecuadorans, he told me, but by “lawyers and consultants and financiers.” Donziger’s ambition was certainly grandiose, but it seemed motivated as much by a combative idealism as by a desire for riches…He felt that he was creating a viable “business model for a human rights case."...

Read the full post here

Related companies: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher