Hide Message

Updating the Resource Centre Digital Platform

The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre is at a critical point in its development. Our digital platform is home to a wealth of information on business and human rights, but hasn’t had a visual refresh for a number of years.

We will soon be updating the site to improve its usability and better serve the thousands of people that use our site to support their work.

Please take an advance peek at our new look, and let us know what you think!

Thank you,
Alex Guy, Digital Officer

Find Out More Hide Message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:
en/lawsuit-against-drummond-for-alleged-complicity-in-killing-34-people-during-colombian-civil-war#c142610

US court of appeal reverses part of dismissal decision in lawsuit against Drummond for killings in Colombia

Author: Terrence P. Collingsworth, International Rights Advocates, Published on: 27 September 2016

"11th Circuit Court of Appeals Issues Favorable Opinion in our case against Drummond", 27 Sep 2016

On September 27, 2016, in Melo et al. v. Drummond Company...the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed in part and affirmed in part the District Court’s dismissal of claims brought by the heirs of 34 decedents they allege were murdered by members of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (“AUC”) who were collaborating with Drummond...Plaintiffs allege that Drummond is liable for wrongful death for the murder of their [relatives] under Colombian law, and the trial court has mandatory diversity jurisdiction...The Appeals Court agreed with Plaintiffs that the trial court could not summarily dismiss these claims and remanded for further consideration...Finally, Plaintiffs allege causes of action for both war crimes and extrajudicial killing against all the Drummond defendants under the Alien Tort Statute...The trial court, based on a ruling limiting the extraterritorial application of the ATS by the U.S. Supreme Court in Kiobel...dismissed those claims with prejudice.  The Appeals Court reversed that holding and directed that the claims be categorized as dismissed without prejudice, leaving room for the Plaintiffs to refile and seek to meet the new standard of the Kiobel decision...

Read the full post here

Related companies: Drummond