abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

15 Jan 2019

Author:
National Review (USA)

USA: Judge blocks decision allowing employers to refuse employees' contraception coverage

"Judge Blocks Rule Change that Would Allow More Employers to Refuse Contraception Coverage", 14 Jan. 2019

A federal judge…blocked a Trump administration rule change that would have expanded the pool of employers who are entitled to refuse to cover employees’ contraception due to religious or moral convictions.

U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam, Jr. found that the rule change would cause harm to the 13 Democratically-controlled states that have sued the administration to block the move. As a result, Gilliam stayed the implementation of the rule change…until the lawsuit is resolved.

Currently, churches and other closely-held private employers are exempt from the Obamacare requirement that all employers provide FDA-approved contraception through their employee health plans at no additional cost. The Trump administration is attempting to expand the religious and moral exemption so that virtually all employers would be eligible to claim it.

The Trump administration cast the injunction as a blow to religious freedom in a statement released Sunday night…

California attorney general Xavier Beccera celebrated the ruling as a victory for women in the 13 states that received an injunction blocking the rule change...