Indonesia: Study identifies major environmental and human rights impacts of Teluk Sepang coal-fired power plant, stressing need for health services and clean energy sources
Residents of Teluk Sepang, Bengkulu, have been struggling against the adverse effects of the Teluk Sepang coal-fired power plant (PLTU) since its construction in 2016. This project is operated by PT Tenaga Listrik Bengkulu (TLB), a joint partnership company between PowerChina Resources and PT Intraco Penta, with financial support from China Eximbank and ICBC.
While it aims to address the region’s electricity needs, a study by Inisiatif Masyarakat Adat (IMA) highlights significant environmental and health impacts; and socioeconomic disruption linked to operations of PLTU. In particular, the power plant is alleged to have caused air, water, and soil pollution; respiratory infections and skin diseases among residents; deteriorating marine ecosystems; displacement of farmers and disruption of fisheries. Further, locals working at the power plant have experienced poor working conditions and health issues without receiving proper medical treatment. The high-voltage transmission lines from PLTU are also a cause for concern for residents due to risk of hazards.
Opposition against the PLTU by locals have existed since the start of the project. However, activists and other volunteers have experienced intimidation. Resistance has now weakened due to limited resources and locals’ financial dependence on the PLTU.
IMA, through Chairwoman Nukila Evanty, emphasized the need for health services and clean energy alternatives. Nukila further urged the government, including the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, the Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Environment, to adopt policies that cater more to the needs of marginalized communities.
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited PT Teluk Sepang Bengkulu/TLB, its parent companies (Power China Resources & PT Intraco Penta Tbk.), and investors (ICBC and China Eximbank) to respond to the allegations. The companies did not respond.