abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

This page is not available in Italiano and is being displayed in English

Lawsuit

Codelco lawsuit (re Talabre tailings dam expansion, Chile)

Status: CLOSED

Date lawsuit was filed
11 Mar 2016
Not applicable
NGO, Human Rights Defender, Community, Indigenous peoples, Environmental concerns group, Individual
Location of Filing: Cile
Location of Incident: Cile
Type of Litigation: Domestic

Companies

Codelco Cile Mining

Sources

In March 2016, a group of individuals and of environmental, feminist and Indigenous organisations, affiliated with the Loa River Water Defense Commission, filed an application for protection (recurso de protección) with the Court of Appeals of Antofagasta against the state-owned enterprise CODELCO (Proceedings 597-2016). The claim sought to halt the expansion of the Talabre tailings dam at Codelco's Radomiro Tomic copper mine, in the Antofagasta region of northern Chile, which had been authorised by the Committee of Environmental Assessment of the region in January 2016. They argued that the expansion, located 3 kilometres from Calama and near the rural towns of Chiu-Chiu and Lasana, posed significant health risks and environmental damage due to potential water contamination from toxic waste and heavy metals. In April 2016, the court dismissed the application because it considered there was no evidence of illegal conduct that would justify granting the requested protection. The case is closed.