abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2004年8月31日

著者:
Ingrid Macdonald, Mining Ombudsman, Oxfam Community Aid Abroad

Mining Ombudsman Annual Report 2004

The 2004 Mining Ombudsman Annual Report examines why the Australian mining industry needs an independent complaints mechanism and what it would look like. It details progress in cases from Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Indonesia and Fiji involving environmental degradation and human rights abuses. [refers to BHP Billiton, Durban Roodepoort Deep (now DRDGold), Emperor Mines, Placer Dome, Climax Mining]