abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송 (SLAPP)

Ecoclub

상태: DISMISSED

소송을 제기한 날짜
2020년 2월 17일
날짜 정확도
모두 일치
Ecoclub
형사소송
적용 불가
Environmental concerns group
소송: 대중 참여에 대한 전략적 소송
법적 주장: Defamation
피해 금액: $5.557
피해 금액 (현지 통화): 150 000 UAH
다음에 의해 소송 제기: Company
목표: 집단, 기구 또는 기관
제소 위치: 우크라이나
사건 위치: 우크라이나
Kronospan 영국 바닥재, 벌목 및 목재, 종이와 판지 기업 응답

출처

In February 2020, representatives of Kronospan filed a defamation lawsuit against the NGO Ecoclub after disseminated information about potential negative environmental impacts, particularly air pollution, of a planned wood processing facility near Rivne, Ukraine. The company demanded compensation of 150 000 UAH (approximately 5000 euro) due to the injury caused to their business reputation, as they claimed these were false statements. The lawsuit was granted by the court and left unchanged by an appeal court. According to the court’s decision, Ecoclub had to withdraw several statements from two publications and social networks and pay a court fee of UAH 4,204. In February 2021, Ecoclub filed an appeal to the Economic Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court requesting to open cassation proceedings and suspend the execution of the appealed decision until the end of its review in cassation and to cancel the decision of the North-Western Economic Appeal Court from January 20, 2021 and to transfer the case for a new trial by an appeal court. Ecoclub has stated the granting of the lawsuit violated the rights of Ecoclub to freely disseminate information and its own comments on the environment impact assessment report for the planned project. On 26 May 2021, the Supreme Court granted decision in favor of Ecoclub.