abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송 (SLAPP)

Hajrija Čobo - Park prirode Trstionica i Boriva

상태: DISMISSED

소송을 제기한 날짜
2023년 12월 12일
날짜 정확도
모두 일치
Hajrija Čobo
민사소송
여성
Park prirode Trstionica i Boriva
Environmental concerns group
소송: 대중 참여에 대한 전략적 소송
법적 주장: Defamation
피해 금액: 1000 USD
피해 금액 (현지 통화): 2,000 KM
다음에 의해 소송 제기: Company
목표: 개인
제소 위치: 보스니아 헤르체고비나
사건 위치: 보스니아 헤르체고비나
Adriatic Metals BH d.o.o. 보스니아 헤르체고비나 채굴 기업 응답

출처

On 12 December 2023, woman environmental rights defender Hajrija Čobo was notified of a defamation lawsuit initiated by the British mining company Adriatic Metals BH d.o.o. The company has a concession for exploring and extracting ores in the Vareš region inthe Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The lawsuit argues that Hajrija Čobo has spread false information about the company in the media and through her social network. It demands compensation of 2,000 KM (approximately 1,000€) for damaging the company’s reputation. Hajrija has been campaigning to protect the forest and watercourses in the Kakanj region against the threats posed by the company’s operation. She is a representative of NGG Park Prirode Trstionica i Boriva, an informal grassroots group of local activists who campaign to protect their forests and rivers, their main drinking water source. On 17 June 2024, the Kakanj Municipal Court dismissed the lawsuit. The court based its verdict on a waiver submitted by the company.