abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

这页面没有简体中文版本,现以English显示

内容有以下的语言版本: English, 日本語

故事

2021年9月20日

Investigation takes stock of venture capital's human rights oversight, finding vast majority of firms are failing responsibilities & lacking diversity

Venture capital (VC) funds focused on the technology sector hold growing importance in the development of emerging technologies, providing crucial early investment for start-ups working on areas such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and surveillance software. These technologies subsequently touch numerous aspects of our lives, and present benefits and opportunities for economic growth, healthcare, and services, but are not always designed with the protection of human rights in mind – and can carry significant risks to privacy and freedom of expression, or contribute to discrimination. As businesses, VC funds are responsible under the UN Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights to take the necessary steps to ensure that their business activities and value chains respect internationally recognized human rights. Yet new research from Amnesty International finds the overwhelming majority of the world’s largest VC firms have failed to put in place robust human rights due diligence policies.

Amnesty International’s findings are documented in a report published in July 2021, Risky Business: How leading venture capital firms ignore human rights when investing in technology. The report focuses on the firms on the Venture Capital Journal’s list of the 50 largest VC firms, as well as three leading tech accelerators (Y Combinator, 500 Startups and TechStars). The authors reviewed publicly available information on each VC firm’s human rights due diligence processes, and sent letters to the firms requesting additional information. They found that none of the ten largest companies had adequate human rights due diligence policies in place, and that only one company (Atomico) from the list had due diligence processes in place that potentially meet the standards outlined in the UNGPs. The report also highlighted the lack of gender and racial diversity in the VC sector and funding and the harms that can result.

The Resource Centre invited the companies listed to respond to the report’s findings. We received responses from Third Rock Ventures, Index Ventures, Sofinnova Partners, and Sinovation Ventures.

In September, blog posts from BSR and the UN Human Rights B-Tech Project recognised the increasing prominence of private equity and VC funds in the development of technology that shapes our lives, and suggested ways that VC firms can meet their human rights responsibilities and contribute to a world where technology aids social progress by enacting policy commitments and strengthening human rights due diligence processes.

企业回应

Index Ventures 浏览回应
Sofinnova Partners 浏览回应
Third Rock Ventures 浏览回应
Summit Partners

没有回应

Rocket Internet

没有回应

DCM Ventures

没有回应

5Y Capital (formerly Morningside Venture Capital)

没有回应

Bain Capital Ventures

没有回应

DCVC

没有回应

IDG Capital

没有回应

Oak HC/FT

没有回应

8VC

没有回应

FirstMark Capital

没有回应

Source Code Capital

没有回应

Social Capital

没有回应

Kleiner Perkins (formerly Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers)

没有回应

OrbiMed Advisors

没有回应

Frazier Healthcare Partners

没有回应

Versant Ventures

没有回应

Atlas Venture

没有回应

Mayfield Fund

没有回应

Clarus Ventures (now part of Blackstone)

没有回应

Venrock

没有回应

Y Combinator

没有回应

New Enterprise Associates

没有回应

Tiger Global Management

没有回应

Sequoia Capital

没有回应

Lightspeed Venture Partners

没有回应

Andreessen Horowitz

没有回应

Accel

没有回应

General Catalyst

没有回应

Founders Fund

没有回应

Battery Ventures

没有回应

Bessemer Venture Partners

没有回应

GGV Capital

没有回应

Flagship Pioneering

没有回应

Qiming Venture Partners

没有回应

IVP

没有回应

Shunwei Capital Partners

没有回应

Matrix Partners

没有回应

ICONIQ Capital

没有回应

ARCH Venture Partners

没有回应

Lux Capital Management

没有回应

Menlo Ventures

没有回应

Sinovation Ventures 浏览回应

时间线