abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

El contenido también está disponible en los siguientes idiomas: English, 日本語

Historia

20 Sep 2021

Investigation takes stock of venture capital's human rights oversight, finding vast majority of firms are failing responsibilities & lacking diversity

Venture capital (VC) funds focused on the technology sector hold growing importance in the development of emerging technologies, providing crucial early investment for start-ups working on areas such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and surveillance software. These technologies subsequently touch numerous aspects of our lives, and present benefits and opportunities for economic growth, healthcare, and services, but are not always designed with the protection of human rights in mind – and can carry significant risks to privacy and freedom of expression, or contribute to discrimination. As businesses, VC funds are responsible under the UN Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights to take the necessary steps to ensure that their business activities and value chains respect internationally recognized human rights. Yet new research from Amnesty International finds the overwhelming majority of the world’s largest VC firms have failed to put in place robust human rights due diligence policies.

Amnesty International’s findings are documented in a report published in July 2021, Risky Business: How leading venture capital firms ignore human rights when investing in technology. The report focuses on the firms on the Venture Capital Journal’s list of the 50 largest VC firms, as well as three leading tech accelerators (Y Combinator, 500 Startups and TechStars). The authors reviewed publicly available information on each VC firm’s human rights due diligence processes, and sent letters to the firms requesting additional information. They found that none of the ten largest companies had adequate human rights due diligence policies in place, and that only one company (Atomico) from the list had due diligence processes in place that potentially meet the standards outlined in the UNGPs. The report also highlighted the lack of gender and racial diversity in the VC sector and funding and the harms that can result.

The Resource Centre invited the companies listed to respond to the report’s findings. We received responses from Third Rock Ventures, Index Ventures, Sofinnova Partners, and Sinovation Ventures.

In September, blog posts from BSR and the UN Human Rights B-Tech Project recognised the increasing prominence of private equity and VC funds in the development of technology that shapes our lives, and suggested ways that VC firms can meet their human rights responsibilities and contribute to a world where technology aids social progress by enacting policy commitments and strengthening human rights due diligence processes.

Respuestas de la empresa

Index Ventures Ver respuesta
Sofinnova Partners Ver respuesta
Third Rock Ventures Ver respuesta
Summit Partners

Sin respuesta

Rocket Internet

Sin respuesta

DCM Ventures

Sin respuesta

5Y Capital (formerly Morningside Venture Capital)

Sin respuesta

Bain Capital Ventures

Sin respuesta

DCVC

Sin respuesta

IDG Capital

Sin respuesta

Oak HC/FT

Sin respuesta

8VC

Sin respuesta

FirstMark Capital

Sin respuesta

Source Code Capital

Sin respuesta

Social Capital

Sin respuesta

Kleiner Perkins (formerly Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers)

Sin respuesta

OrbiMed Advisors

Sin respuesta

Frazier Healthcare Partners

Sin respuesta

Versant Ventures

Sin respuesta

Atlas Venture

Sin respuesta

Mayfield Fund

Sin respuesta

Clarus Ventures (now part of Blackstone)

Sin respuesta

Venrock

Sin respuesta

Y Combinator

Sin respuesta

New Enterprise Associates

Sin respuesta

Tiger Global Management

Sin respuesta

Sequoia Capital

Sin respuesta

Lightspeed Venture Partners

Sin respuesta

Andreessen Horowitz

Sin respuesta

Accel

Sin respuesta

General Catalyst

Sin respuesta

Founders Fund

Sin respuesta

Battery Ventures

Sin respuesta

Bessemer Venture Partners

Sin respuesta

GGV Capital

Sin respuesta

Flagship Pioneering

Sin respuesta

Qiming Venture Partners

Sin respuesta

IVP

Sin respuesta

Shunwei Capital Partners

Sin respuesta

Matrix Partners

Sin respuesta

ICONIQ Capital

Sin respuesta

ARCH Venture Partners

Sin respuesta

Lux Capital Management

Sin respuesta

Menlo Ventures

Sin respuesta

Sinovation Ventures Ver respuesta

Línea del tiempo