企業回應
Energy Transfer 未有對（XX）作出回應
屬於以下案件的一部分
Ellen Gerhart
Greenpeace International
Krystal Two Bulls
BankTrack
Earth First movement!
Greenpeace Fund, Inc.
Greenpeace Inc.
Greenpeace International
SLAPPs brought across the globe to intimidate & silence human rights defenders raising concerns about business practice
-
Rejoinder from Greenpeace to Resolute Forest Products' response
適用語言: English -
Rejoinder from Sherpa to Socfin's response
適用語言: English -
Thammakaset did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
White Brenner LLP did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Pollos El Cortijo did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Albtek Energy did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Mineral Resource Commodities (MRC) did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Roseburg Forest Products did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
MMG Limited Las Bambas did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Zhong Yin Cambodia B Textile Co. Ltd did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Conseil Interprofessionnel du Vin de Bordeaux did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Energix Renewable Energies Ltd. did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Empresa Minera Inversiones los Pinares did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Lydian Armenia's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Socfin's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Resolute Forest Product's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
CoreCivic's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English
瀏覽完整時間線
USA: Greenpeace International faces a SLAPP by the US-based fossil fuel company Energy Transfer
-
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
適用語言: English -
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
適用語言: English -
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
Greenpeace International
適用語言: English
瀏覽完整時間線
USA: Greenpeace ordered to pay USD345 million to Energy Transfer for its role in the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline
-
Netherlands: Court allows Greenpeace case against Energy Transfer over US litigation against NGO to proceed
-
USA: North Dakota Supreme Court orders anti-suit injunction partially restricting Greenpeace’s anti-SLAPP case against Energy Transfer in the Netherlands
適用語言: English -
Netherlands: Court hears arguments on Energy Transfer’s request to dismiss or stay Greenpeace International’s lawsuit under the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive
適用語言: English -
USA: Judge finalises USD345m judgment against Greenpeace in Energy Transfer lawsuit over Dakota Access Pipeline protests
適用語言: English -
USA: Energy Transfer requests North Dakota Supreme Court to block Greenpeace’s lawsuit under EU anti-SLAPP Directive
適用語言: English -
USA: Judge reduces damages to be paid by Greenpeace to Energy Transfer over Dakota Access Pipeline protests to USD345 million
適用語言: English -
Netherlands: Greenpeace International anti-SLAPP lawsuit against Energy Transfer proceeds after US court rejects injunction request
適用語言: English -
USA: North Dakota judge rejects Energy Transfer’s request to halt Greenpeace’s lawsuit under EU anti-SLAPP Directive
適用語言: English -
USA: Dakota Access Pipeline developer seeks to block Greenpeace lawsuit in the Netherlands
適用語言: English -
Netherlands: Greenpeace’s lawsuit against Energy Transfer under EU Anti-SLAPP Directive opens in court
適用語言: English -
USA: Jury orders Greenpeace to pay USD660 million to Energy Transfer in lawsuit over protests against Dakota Access Pipeline
-
USA: Energy Transfer’s $300 million Dakota Access pipeline lawsuit against Greenpeace could have “chilling” effect on free speech, say experts
-
Netherlands: Greenpeace International uses EU anti-SLAPP Directive in lawsuit against Energy Transfer
適用語言: English -
Energy Transfer's response on SLAPP against Greenpeace
適用語言: English -
US: Greenpeace sends Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer using the recent EU anti-SLAPP Directive
適用語言: English -
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
適用語言: English -
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
適用語言: English -
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
適用語言: English -
USA: Developer of Dakota Access oil pipeline sues Greenpeace in state court after dismissed federal racketeering claim
適用語言: English -
Greenpeace International
適用語言: English -
Greenpeace International
適用語言: English
瀏覽完整時間線