Company Response
Energy Transfer Partners has not responded to
Part of the following timelines
Ellen Gerhart
Greenpeace International
Krystal Two Bulls
BankTrack
Earth First movement!
Greenpeace Fund, Inc.
Greenpeace Inc.
Greenpeace International
SLAPPs brought across the globe to intimidate & silence human rights defenders raising concerns about business practice
-
Rejoinder from Greenpeace to Resolute Forest Products' response
-
Rejoinder from Sherpa to Socfin's response
-
Thammakaset did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
White Brenner LLP did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Pollos El Cortijo did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Albtek Energy did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Mineral Resource Commodities (MRC) did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Roseburg Forest Products did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
MMG Limited Las Bambas did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Zhong Yin Cambodia B Textile Co. Ltd did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Conseil Interprofessionnel du Vin de Bordeaux did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Energix Renewable Energies Ltd. did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Empresa Minera Inversiones los Pinares did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Lydian Armenia's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Socfin's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
Resolute Forest Product's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
CoreCivic's response to SLAPPed but not silenced report
View full story
USA: Greenpeace International faces a SLAPP by the US-based fossil fuel company Energy Transfer
USA: Greenpeace ordered to pay USD660 million to Energy Transfer for its role in the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline
-
USA: Jury orders Greenpeace to pay USD660 million to Energy Transfer in lawsuit over protests against Dakota Access Pipeline
A jury in North Dakota has found Greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims in a lawsuit brought by Energy Transfer accusing the NGO of orchestrating protests against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The company has been awarded 660 million dollars in damages.
-
USA: Energy Transfer’s $300 million Dakota Access pipeline lawsuit against Greenpeace could have “chilling” effect on free speech, say experts
Fossil fuel firm Energy Transfer Partners trial against Greenpeace over anti-pipeline protests is starting in North Dakota.
-
Energy Transfer's response on SLAPP against Greenpeace
-
US: Greenpeace sends Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer using the recent EU anti-SLAPP Directive
-
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
USA: Developer of Dakota Access oil pipeline sues Greenpeace in state court after dismissed federal racketeering claim
-
Greenpeace International
-
Greenpeace International
View full story