abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

法律訴訟(針對公眾參與的策略性訴訟)

Christophe Sion

狀態: ONGOING

提訴日期
2026年4月1日
日期準確度
年份和月份正確
Christophe Sion
男性
傳媒;媒體
訴訟:針對公眾參與的策略性訴訟
法律申索: 其他
被告人數: 1
訴訟類型: Domestic
提訴方: Company
目標: Individual
申訴地點: 西班牙
事發地點: 西班牙
Griño Ecologíc 西班牙 廢物處理 企業回應
其他相關方

Sources

In October 2025, Griñó Ecològic filed a criminal complaint against journalist Rafa Marrasé, filmmaker Christophe Sion, Gerard Jara, Magdalena Barceló, Fundació Jara Barceló and the environmental organisation GEPEC-EdC. The complaint includes allegations related to procedural fraud, market manipulation and market abuse.

In April 2026, Rafa Marrasé, Christophe Sion, Gerard Jara and Magdalena Barceló received court summonses in connection with the criminal proceedings.

The complaint is linked to the investigative documentary Insostenible, rere la brossa, directed by Christophe Sion and based on investigative work by journalist Rafa Marrasé. The documentary examines the production, management, transport and traceability of waste, including cross-border waste movements within the European Union and waste handling at the Port of Tarragona. Griñó Ecològic is one of the companies whose activities are examined within this broader investigation.

Those affected by the complaint have publicly raised concerns that the proceedings may have a chilling effect on investigative journalism, environmental advocacy and public-interest scrutiny of corporate activity. The case has been described by several organisations and media outlets as bearing the hallmarks of a SLAPP.