abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

文章

2012年8月8日

作者:
Kristin Linsley Myles, Munger Tolles & Olson, counsel of record

[PDF] Esther Kiobel, et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al. - Brief of Former State Department Legal Advisers as amici curiae in support of Respondents

查看所有標籤
Whether the ATS authorizes an action for conduct taking place solely within the territory of a foreign nation has been a matter of great interest to the United States and to the State Department because any extraterritorial application of U.S. law has significant foreign policy implications…In recognition of these concerns, there has developed a well-established presumption against extraterritorial application of U.S. law that this Court consistently has applied. The presumption serves to avoid the foreign relations issues that would arise were U.S. courts, without clear authorization from Congress, to project U.S. law into foreign territory and thus infringe upon the sovereignty of another nation.

時間線