abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

法律訴訟(針對公眾參與的策略性訴訟)

2021年1月19日

Rainforest Rescue (Rettet den Regenwald)

狀態: SETTLED

提訴日期
2021年1月19日
日期準確度
年份和月份正確
民用
不適用
Rainforest Rescue (Rettet den Regenwald)
環境問題小組
訴訟:針對公眾參與的策略性訴訟
法律申索: 誹謗
提訴方: Company
目標: Group, Organisation or Institution
申訴地點: 德國
事發地點: 德國
Korindo Group 印尼 棕櫚樹和棕櫚油, 跨產業綜合企業, 金融和銀行業, 伐木和木材, 紙和紙板, 房地產開發, 房地產管理 企業回應

Sources

In January 2020, Rainforest Rescue (Rettet den Regenwald, Germany) and one of Mighty Earth’s NGO partners, Center for International Policy, USA, have had to contend with a defamation lawsuit against them in the Hamburg Regional Court by a supplier to the Korindo conglomerate, a notorious Korean-Indonesian palm oil, logging, and wind tower manufacturing giant. The lawsuit is based on letters signed in October 2016 by Mighty Earth, Rainforest Rescue, and a coalition of other NGOs that addressed Korindo’s involvement in large-scale deforestation for palm oil in Papua, Indonesia. The lawsuit challenges some of the assertions in the letters and is demanding a retraction of those statements as well as seeking judicial penalties including hefty fines and imprisonment if those statements are made again. The first court hearing took place on 22 January 2021. We invited the company to respond; it did. A rejoinder from Rainforest Rescue is available here. On 21 February 2023, the dispute was settled based on the decision by a German court that the company could not sue the Center for International Policy.