文章
Speak without fear: The case for stronger U.S. policy on human rights defenders
Although this is not a comprehensive survey of U.S. embassy efforts to protect human rights defenders worldwide, several common threads emerged in our research...
- In Washington, D.C., the State Department has an open-door approach to human rights defenders
- Other countries’ embassies rely on U.S. embassies for leadership on this issue.
- U.S. embassies have many tools that can be used to support human rights defenders.
- When engaging with U.S. embassies, human rights defenders see more “personality” than “policy.”
- U.S. embassies rarely initiate follow-up with human rights defenders after meeting with them.
- Many embassies have not found a way to reach rural areas, where the threats are often greatest.
- U.S. embassies appear to struggle when dealing with “repressive allies,” such as Bahrain, Honduras, the Philippines and Saudi Arabia.
- U.S. embassies do not systematically coordinate their work on human rights defenders with their economic portfolios.
- Existing safeguards, such as the Leahy Law, are not sufficient to prevent U.S. security assistance from supporting perpetrators of attacks on human rights defenders.