abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

Corporate Legal Accountablity Resource Sheet: Anti-SLAPP Legislation

Last updated on 13 December 2021

Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) are frequently deployed by companies to silence and harass critics. SLAPPs seek to manipulate the judicial system by masquerading as legitimate legal claims, abusing laws (e.g., on libel/defamation) to target valid and protected speech or protest. Several countries have passed legislation that aims – or can be used – to protect defenders against SLAPPs There are also various proposals for anti-SLAPP legislation in several countries where such protection is currently lacking.

This Resource Sheet provides an overview of Anti-SLAPP laws and itiatives around the world, key messages and recommendations and further reading on the topic.

  1. Anti-SLAPP Laws and Proposals

Anti-SLAPP Legislation

In the Americas:

In Asia and the Pacific:

Anti-SLAPP Initiatives

  • Colombia
    • Proposal to introduce anti-SLAPP provisions and amend the General Code of Procedure and Law 906 of 2004, to eradicate judicial or litigious harassment aimed at curtailing the rights to freedom of expression, information and association.
  • European Union:
  • United Kingdom:
  • SLAPPs are an abuse of the law, not a legitimate use of the law. Unscrupulous companies abuse existing legal frameworks and laws, such as those on libel and other types of defamation, to pursue expensive and demoralising legal proceedings. SLAPPs are often accompanied by other types of attacks against defenders, in some cases perpetrated by the state, such as intimidation, threats and various forms of judicial harassment, including both civil and criminal legal action.
  • In order to effectively fight SLAPPs, we need robust legal frameworks that prevent companies from filing SLAPPs in the first place and allow courts to identify, call out and dismiss them as soon as they are filed.

    3. Key Recommendations

Governments should

  • Enact anti-SLAPP laws that prohibit SLAPPs and penalise businesses that file these types of cases.
  • Ensure that the judiciary is aware of SLAPPs and empowered to take action to dismiss them.
  • Provide support to HRDs who are facing SLAPPs and consult them on anti-SLAPPs efforts.

Investors should

  • Engage in discussions regarding public policy on SLAPPs, whenever this is appropriate and supported by local civil society. This includes raising the importance of anti-SLAPP legislation with government bodies.
  • Communicate that they expect investee companies will not bring lawsuits with the intention of silencing critics, continuously monitor their use, and act consistently on their findings.

Companies should:

  • Refrain from and commit to not using SLAPPs or other forms of judicial harassment to shut down public participation and critical advocacy.
  • Communicate that they expect their business partners not to bring SLAPPs with the intention of silencing critics, continuously monitor their use and act consistently on their findings.
  • Insurance (and other companies) should commit not to finance SLAPP litigation.
  • Law firms should undertake rigorous due diligence to ensure that the cases they take on are not SLAPPs and refrain from representing companies in SLAPP suits against human rights defenders.

Bar Associations should

  • Update ethics codes to ensure that SLAPPs are a sanctionable offence, stipulating that lawyers who use these abusive tactics face sanctions and penalties.

Legal Advocates & Civil Society should:

  • Where specific anti-SLAPP provisions do not exist use existing legal and constitutional norms on freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly to defend against SLAPPs.
  • Where anti-SLAPP provisions exist, familiarise themselves with their implications in cases where fundamental rights are impacted.
  • Consider filing counter-lawsuits against companies to redress harm caused by SLAPPs and to organise communities and encourage them to assert their rights through legal action.
  • Carry out training and awareness building for lawyers and judges to inform them about SLAPPs tactics.

    4. Further Reading

From the Resource Centre

From others

Anti-SLAPP Coalitions

  • Asina Loyiko: Campaign with resources and connection hub for activists confronted by SLAPPs
  • CASE: Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe
  • On ne se taira pas (We will not be silent): Collective working to end the use of gagging orders
  • Protect the Protest: Task force working to end the use of SLAPPs