abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapelocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewprofilerefreshnewssearchsecurityPathtagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Opinion

Duty-bound to protect

UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré

This blog is part of a series 'Towards Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence'.

Fire disasters in textile factories in Bangladesh and Pakistan, environmental destruction through coal mining in Colombia, devastating breaches of a dam from a flood control basin in Brazil or the massacre of coalminers in South Africa: it’s also because of such calamities that the debate about fair consumption has gained momentum in recent years. States, companies, civil society and consumers in the Global North also bear responsibility for the purchase and use of commodities and goods. At the same time, global supply chains and production processes are today more comprehensive and more complex than ever before. For many people they are simply not transparent.

Read the rest at International Politics and Society.

Towards Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence

Opinion

Finnish EU Presidency urged to toughen up human rights rules on business

19/2/19 - Sharan Burrow, secretary general, ITUC, and Phil Bloomer, executive director of BHRRC 19 Feb 2019

Opinion

Will Germany become a leader in the drive for corporate due diligence on human rights?

Saskia Wilks and Johannes Blankenbach, BHRRC 20 Feb 2019

Opinion

Responsible Business Conduct - the European Business model of the 2020s

Heidi Hautala, Member of European Parliament & Vice-President of the European Parliament 21 May 2019

View Full Series