Hide Message

Updating the Resource Centre Digital Platform

The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre is at a critical point in its development. Our digital platform is home to a wealth of information on business and human rights, but hasn’t had a visual refresh for a number of years.

We will soon be updating the site to improve its usability and better serve the thousands of people that use our site to support their work.

Please take an advance peek at our new look, and let us know what you think!

Thank you,
Alex Guy, Digital Officer

Find Out More Hide Message

You are being redirected to the story the piece of content is found in so you can read it in context. Please click the following link if you are not automatically redirected within a couple seconds:

Columnist discusses approaches to socially responsible investment in conflict zones such as South Sudan

Author: Oliver Balch, The Guardian (UK), Published on: 31 August 2015

"What can a South Sudan brewery teach us about business in conflict zones?"

SABMiller’s brewery in South Sudan is struggling and may face closure within weeks. This news is perhaps not surprising. Ethnic tensions and political discord have plagued the region for decades...Volatility is part and parcel of investing in conflict-riven countries, but where there are opportunities, companies will continue to seek a presence...But a key question is how companies can ensure they can establish a long lasting presence which benefits both their business and the region.

“Companies have an obligation to do due diligence on the countries and individuals that they engage with,” says Emma Vickers, country coordinator in South Sudan for Global Witness...That obligation is both moral (to ensure that corporate revenues aren’t helping perpetuate violence or human rights abuses) and fiduciary (to make sure investors’ capital is reasonably protected). There’s also a legal duty of care towards a company’s employees...

A more radical option is for investors to isolate themselves entirely...“The way that big multinationals have traditionally dealt with the problems of instability is to build what are essentially corporate welfare states in developing countries, with water, education, housing, healthcare and so forth.”...In an increasing number of cases, governments are obliging investors to actively support economic development measures designed to promote stability, says John Morrison, executive director of the Institute for Human Rights and Business. [also refers to Pearson & Unilever]

Read the full post here

Related companies: Pearson SABMiller (part of Anheuser-Busch InBev) Unilever