abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Company Response

30 Oct 2012

Author:
BHP Billiton

BHP Billiton response

BHP Billiton welcomed Mr Ustate’s question at its AGM and the opportunity to talk to him after the meeting. The community of Manantial was displaced around 15 years before BHP Billiton took up equity in the mine so it is not an issue the company has direct knowledge of. We have, however, asked that Cerrejon management meet with the Mr Ustate (an initial meeting was held before the AGM) to ensure his concerns are fully understood and addressed as appropriate. It is also important to understand that the river diversion is an option that is being considered for further expansion of the mine. It has yet to be approved by the shareholders and any decision will take into account the results of environmental impact assessments and extensive community consultation”.