Company Response
CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation) has not responded to
Part of the following timelines
Uganda: Environmental and land rights defenders face harassment and arrest for anti-eviction protests. Includes company responses
-
Total's response on harassment of environmental and land rights defenders in Uganda
-
Tullow Oil's response on harassment of environmental and land rights defenders in Uganda
-
CNOOC did not respond
-
Rai Holdings Private Limited did not respond
-
New report reveals extent of alleged abuses by French oil major Total in Tanzania & Uganda ahead of appeal court ruling
Friends of the Earth France and Survie have published a new report on Total's activities in Uganda and Tanzania, reporting that the human rights violations denounced over a year ago are still ongoing and have multiplied, now impacting about 100,000 people.
-
Uganda: Eight human rights defenders arrested for allegedly beating Great Seasons' workers freed on bail after 30 days in prison
A Ugandan court has released eight human rights defenders who allegedly threatened to harm a police officer and workers of Great Season on bail. The defenders have been protesting alleged forced eviction by several agribusinesses in the region
-
Uganda: Civil society calls for release of arrested land & environmental defenders
-
Uganda: Environmental defenders arrested for criticism over sugarcane and oil activities
-
Uganda: Families violently evicted, land rights defenders criminalised, to make way for plantations
-
Lawyers defending communities allegedly displaced for private investment charged
-
Uganda: Harassment and arbitrary detention of land rights defenders in the Kiryandongo district
-
Uganda: 28 human rights defenders face criminal charges after farm worker dies in violent clashes over alleged forced eviction
-
Uganda: Threats against two defenders who testified in the trial against Total in France
View full story
Increased legal protection needed as attacks against business & defenders mount in 2020; cos. respond
-
Fyffes response on attack against union leader in 2020 HRDs report
-
W&D responded on attack against Cambodian union leader in 2020 HRDs report
-
Think Biotech (Cambodia) did not respond on attacks against Cambodian defenders in 2020 HRDs report
-
JBS response on attack against union leader in 2020 HRDs report
-
Total's response on attacks against Ugandan defenders in 2020 HRDs report
-
Total's response on harassment of environmental and land rights defenders in Uganda
-
CNOOC did not respond
-
Tullow Oil's response on harassment of environmental and land rights defenders in Uganda
-
Rai Holdings Private Limited did not respond
-
Mizuno's response re. VIP factory
-
VIP's response re. allegations of union-busting
-
Evil Bikes' response re. allegations of union-busting
-
Pivot Cycles' response re. allegations of union-busting at VIP
-
CCM Hockey did not respond
-
Wilson did not respond
View full story
Uganda & Tanzania: NGOs urge banks not to finance proposed oil pipeline due to human rights concerns incl. displacement and loss of livelihoods; incl. responses and non responses from banks
-
Tanzania & Uganda: Fifteen banks have ruled out financing the East African Crude Oil Pipeline but several major lenders remain silent
-
Response by banks to campaign urging them not to finance EACOP
The StopEACOP campaign has written to banks that may be approached to finance EACOP urging them not to. The responses and non-responses are included.
-
NGOs urge Banks not to finance East Africa Crude Oil Pipeline
263 civil society organisations (CSOs) have urged banks not to participate in a $2.5 billion project finance loan for the construction of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project.
-
Agriculture Bank of China did not respond to EACOP campaign
-
China International Capital Company did not respond to EACOP campaign
-
Bank of China did not respond to EACOP campaign
-
ICBC did not respond to EACOP campaign
-
China Construction Bank did not respond to EACOP campaign
-
Bank of America did not respond to alleged link to EACOP project
-
Goldman Sachs did not respond to alleged link to EACOP project
-
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group responds to alleged link to EACOP project
-
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group responds to alleged link to EACOP project
-
NGOs urge banks not to finance East African Crude Oil Pipeline citing environmental & social concerns
263 non-governmental organisations have urged 25 banks listed as potential financiers of the $3.5 billion development not to participate in the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (Eacop) project citing environmental and social risks.
-
Standard Bank suspends role in East African Crude Oil Pipeline pending environmental and social impact study
South Africa’s Standard Bank, which was to have been a financier of the $3.5bn East African Crude Oil Pipeline (Eacop), has announced that it is suspending support while it waits for the outcome of an environmental and social impact study.
-
CNOOC did not respond
-
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China did not respond
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China did not respond
View full story