Company Response
Energy Transfer Partners has not responded to
Part of the following timelines
USA: EarthRights International identifies 152 cases of SLAPPs & judicial harassment by the fossil fuel industry in the past decade; incl. co. responses
-
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
-
Mountain Valley Pipeline's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Chevron's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
California Independent Petroleum Association's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Range Resources' response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Enbridge's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
ExxonMobil's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Civitas Resources did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Coterra Energy did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
American Consolidated Natural Resources (previously Murray Energy) did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Drummond did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Cardno ChemRisk did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Martin Marietta did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
TC Energy (formerly Transcanada) did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Lake Point Restoration did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Millennium Pipeline Company did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Phillips 66 did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
View full story
USA: Greenpeace International faces a SLAPP by the US-based fossil fuel company Energy Transfer
USA: Greenpeace ordered to pay USD660 million to Energy Transfer for its role in the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline
-
USA: Jury orders Greenpeace to pay USD660 million to Energy Transfer in lawsuit over protests against Dakota Access Pipeline
A jury in North Dakota has found Greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims in a lawsuit brought by Energy Transfer accusing the NGO of orchestrating protests against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The company has been awarded 660 million dollars in damages.
-
USA: Energy Transfer’s $300 million Dakota Access pipeline lawsuit against Greenpeace could have “chilling” effect on free speech, say experts
Fossil fuel firm Energy Transfer Partners trial against Greenpeace over anti-pipeline protests is starting in North Dakota.
-
Energy Transfer's response on SLAPP against Greenpeace
-
US: Greenpeace sends Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer using the recent EU anti-SLAPP Directive
-
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
USA: Developer of Dakota Access oil pipeline sues Greenpeace in state court after dismissed federal racketeering claim
-
Greenpeace International
-
Greenpeace International
View full story