Company Response
Energy Transfer Partners has not responded to
Part of the following timelines
USA: EarthRights International identifies 152 cases of SLAPPs & judicial harassment by the fossil fuel industry in the past decade; incl. co. responses
-
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
-
Mountain Valley Pipeline's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Chevron's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
California Independent Petroleum Association's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Range Resources' response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Enbridge's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
ExxonMobil's response to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Civitas Resources did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Coterra Energy did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
American Consolidated Natural Resources (previously Murray Energy) did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Drummond did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Cardno ChemRisk did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Martin Marietta did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
TC Energy (formerly Transcanada) did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Lake Point Restoration did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Millennium Pipeline Company did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Phillips 66 did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
View full story
USA: Greenpeace International faces a SLAPP by the US-based fossil fuel company Energy Transfer
USA: Greenpeace ordered to pay USD345 million to Energy Transfer for its role in the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline
-
USA: Energy Transfer requests North Dakota Supreme Court to block Greenpeace’s lawsuit under EU anti-SLAPP Directive
Energy Transfer has petitioned the North Dakota Supreme Court to overturn a lower court’s refusal to block Greenpeace’s lawsuit in the Netherlands, brought under the EU anti-SLAPP Directive, which seeks compensation for the company’s legal actions against the NGO following protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016–2017.
-
USA: Judge reduces damages to be paid by Greenpeace to Energy Transfer over Dakota Access Pipeline protests to USD345 million
A North Dakota state judge has partially granted Greenpeace’s claims against the jury verdict that ordered it to pay more than USD660 million in damages to Energy Transfer in connection with protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017, reducing the amount to USD345 million.
-
Netherlands: Greenpeace International anti-SLAPP lawsuit against Energy Transfer proceeds after US court rejects injunction request
“Greenpeace International’s landmark anti-intimidation lawsuit against Energy Transfer continues uninterrupted in the Netherlands after a North Dakota judge yesterday rejected the US-based fossil fuel pipeline company’s request for an anti-suit injunction, an attempt to avoid accountability under the European Union’s anti-SLAPP laws.”
-
USA: North Dakota judge rejects Energy Transfer’s request to halt Greenpeace’s lawsuit under EU anti-SLAPP Directive
A North Dakota state judge has denied Energy Transfer’s motion to block Greenpeace’s lawsuit in the Netherlands brought under the EU anti-SLAPP Directive. The NGO seeks compensation in connection with legal proceedings that Energy Transfer initiated in North Dakota over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017.
-
USA: Dakota Access Pipeline developer seeks to block Greenpeace lawsuit in the Netherlands
-
Netherlands: Greenpeace’s lawsuit against Energy Transfer under EU Anti-SLAPP Directive opens in court
The first court hearing of Greenpeace International’s lawsuit against Energy Transfer under the recently introduced EU Anti-SLAPP Directive took place in Amsterdam. The organisation is seeking compensation in relation to legal proceedings brought by Energy Transfer in North Dakota over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017, which resulted in a USD 660 million damages award in favour of the company.
-
USA: Jury orders Greenpeace to pay USD660 million to Energy Transfer in lawsuit over protests against Dakota Access Pipeline
A jury in North Dakota has found Greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims in a lawsuit brought by Energy Transfer accusing the NGO of orchestrating protests against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The company has been awarded 660 million dollars in damages.
-
USA: Energy Transfer’s $300 million Dakota Access pipeline lawsuit against Greenpeace could have “chilling” effect on free speech, say experts
Fossil fuel firm Energy Transfer Partners trial against Greenpeace over anti-pipeline protests is starting in North Dakota.
-
Netherlands: Greenpeace International uses EU anti-SLAPP Directive in lawsuit against Energy Transfer
Greenpeace International is suing fossil fuel company Energy Transfer in a Dutch court, testing the EU's new anti-SLAPP directive. They seek damages from Energy Transfer's "SLAPP" lawsuits.
-
Energy Transfer's response on SLAPP against Greenpeace
-
US: Greenpeace sends Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer using the recent EU anti-SLAPP Directive
-
Report: The fossil fuel industry’s use of SLAPPs and judicial harassment in the United States
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to ERI briefing about SLAPPs & judicial harassment
-
Energy Transfer did not respond to SLAPPed but not silenced report
-
USA: Developer of Dakota Access oil pipeline sues Greenpeace in state court after dismissed federal racketeering claim
-
Greenpeace International
-
Greenpeace International
View full story