abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

The content is also available in the following languages: 日本語

Story

15 Feb 2022

Japan: Labour dispute continues for more than 18 months after IBM allegedly refuses to disclose information requested by union on AI-driven wage assessments; incl. co. response

In April 2020, the IBM Japan branch of the Japan Metal Manufacturing, Information and Telecommunication Workers Union, which has employees at IBM Japan as members, filed a complaint to Labour Relations Commission claiming that IBM Japan refused to respond to collective bargaining in good faith by not disclosing information on AI-driven system for personnel evaluation and wage assessment.

According to the complaint, IBM Japan introduced Watson into wage assessments in 2019. Since then, the union repetitively asked IBM Japan to disclose information regarding the new system including AI's learning data and the output it displays to managers who assess it. IBM Japan has refused to do so by explaining the information is not intended to be disclosed and claiming that Watson is merely a support tool for managers.

A lawyer representing the union points out four possible adverse effects of the use of AI in this context, including the invasion of privacy, the increase of discrimination and unfair treatment, the black-boxing of personnel evaluation, and the likelihood of automation bias.

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited IBM Japan to respond to the alleged matter. The response is provided below.

Privacy information

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies. You can set your privacy choices below. Changes will take effect immediately.

For more information on our use of web storage, please refer to our Data Usage and Cookies Policy

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

Analytics cookie

ON
OFF

When you access our website we use Google Analytics to collect information on your visit. Accepting this cookie will allow us to understand more details about your journey, and improve how we surface information. All analytics information is anonymous and we do not use it to identify you. Google provides a Google Analytics opt-out add on for all popular browsers.

Promotional cookies

ON
OFF

We share news and updates on business and human rights through third party platforms, including social media and search engines. These cookies help us to understand the performance of these promotions.

Your privacy choices for this site

This site uses cookies and other web storage technologies to enhance your experience beyond necessary core functionality.