abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Company Response

20 Apr 2020

Author:
Kronospan

Kronospan response

...Despite numerous attempts by Kronospan to have constructive discussions with Ecoclub they have been unwilling to enter into a dialogue with us about the Environmental Impact Assessment that has already been undertaken, and continue to propagate false information to the wider community...As a result, Kronospan has been forced to take action against Ecoclub regarding their unfounded objections to our investment in Horodok, Ukraine. The plant is being built to European standards, and will meet European standards of environmental performance...

Part of the following timelines

Ukraine: Activists face defamation charges after alerting public to potential adverse impacts of planned wood processing factory owned by Kronospan; incl. company comments

Technoprivod lawsuit against environmental NGO (re defamation, Ukraine)