abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Article

7 Jul 2011

Author:
Amnesty Intl. UK

[PDF] Out of Control: The case for a complete overhaul of enforced removals by private contractors [UK]

See all tags
Where private contractors are used, training must be significantly improved and the awarding of contracts should be dependent upon the suitability and robustness of the training, accountability and compliance mechanisms put in place. Any contractor using mechanical restraints such as handcuffs must be trained to use them safely. All removals should be independently monitored by a competent independent body which accompanies, monitors and reports on all stages of the removal process...Reliance’s Managing Director Seb Stewart issued the following short statement in response to the briefing: “You will be aware that the Home Office sets policy in this area and at this stage I do not wish to comment”. [includes a statement by G4S]