abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb
Company Response

30 Jan 2017


Response by Enel

…It is our opinion that the facts on which the article is based include a number of factual inaccuracies, misrepresentations and some basic misunderstandings of the case, of how the Colombian Legal System works and on the fundamentals of the Colombian energy market. In addition, some of the article statements have in the meanwhile ascertained as wrong, both in the Colombian Court of Law and in the court of Colombian public opinion…We trust that the facts below will show that El Quimbo hydro power project goes beyond the simple compliance with the environmental requirements, that are clearly fulfilled…We would be delighted to work with you, as we do with many other act organizations who wish to engage constructively to ensure transparency and fairness, in an open and accurate debate.