abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube
Lawsuit

Xstrata lawsuit (re violent protests in Peru, filed in the UK)

Status: CLOSED

Date lawsuit was filed
1 Jan 2015
Date accuracy
Year Correct
Not applicable
Human Rights Defender, Indigenous peoples, Community
Location of Filing: United Kingdom
Location of Incident: Peru
Type of Litigation: Transnational

Companies

Glencore Switzerland Metals & steel, Mining, Oil, gas & coal
Xstrata (now part of Glencore) Switzerland Mining
Xstrata Tintaya Peru Mining

Sources

In 2015, 22 Indigenous Peruvian environmental activists filed a lawsuit against Xstrata at the London High Court for its alleged involvement in violent protests with two deaths against the company's copper mine. They argue that the company provided financial support to the Peruvian police and logistical aid, equipment, and vehicles, encouraging them to use excessive force against the Tintaya mine protesters. Xstrata denies the allegations and stated that “protection [by the Peruvian police] was necessary…”. In October 2017, a hearing on the status of limitation under Peruvian law took place before the English High Court of Justice. In January 2018, the Court dismissed the claims on the grounds that they are time-barred under Peruvian law.

Timeline