Rejoinder from Coffee Watch re- company responses to its allegations of attacks on deforestation legislation
âŠCoffee Watch disagrees with the false dichotomy regarding the EUDRâs impact on smallholder farmers underpinning the ECFâs letterâŠThe ECFâs response exploits the struggle of smallholder farmers as a smokescreen to dismantle vital regulationsâregulations that do not even apply to the farmers but to corporations importing coffee to EuropeâŠ
âŠAs we know, coffee is the sixth largest driver of deforestation in the world. Today, the sustainability of the coffee industry is under threat due to decades of deforestation which have affected microclimates in coffee growing areas and caused adverse weather events that threaten all farming - including coffee cultivation - and land suitable for coffeeâŠ
âŠThese groups actively worked to weaken, derail, and delay the regulationâarguing that compliance is too complex, costly, or prematureârather than engaging in meaningful efforts to meet its requirements or adjust the law to make it more impactful and more positive for smallholders. This pattern of lobbying came very close to undermining the EUDR and hamstringing genuine progress in addressing deforestation and protecting human rightsâŠ
There is a much better third option that allows for robust regulation in coffee and for smallholder coffee producers to thrive. Coffee Watch urges coffee companies to enable smallholder compliance with the EUDR by paying smallholders a living incomeâŠ