abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

This page is not available in Italiano and is being displayed in English

Lawsuit

17 Lug 2017

California communities’ lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies (re climate change compensation)

Status: ONGOING

Date lawsuit was filed
17 Lug 2017
Sconosciuto
Community
Location of Filing: Stati Uniti d'America
Location of Incident: Stati Uniti d'America
Type of Litigation: Domestic

Companies

bp Regno Unito Oil, gas & coal
ConocoPhillips Stati Uniti d'America Oil, gas & coal
Chevron Stati Uniti d'America Oil, gas & coal
ExxonMobil Stati Uniti d'America Oil, gas & coal
Eni Italia Oil, gas & coal
Marathon Oil Stati Uniti d'America Oil, gas & coal
Occidental Petroleum Stati Uniti d'America Oil, gas & coal
Pemex Messico Oil, gas & coal
Shell plc Regno Unito Oil, gas & coal
Equinor (formerly Statoil) Norvegia Oil, gas & coal
TotalEnergies (formerly Total) Francia Oil, gas & coal, Energy
Marathon Petroleum Stati Uniti d'America Oil, gas & coal

Sources

Snapshot: In 2017, three local governments in California filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fueld companies, including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell. They allege defendants were aware of the impact of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They seek compensation for current and future costs of adapating to the consequences of climate change. The case is ongoing.

On 17 July 2017, three local governments in California (San Mateo County, Marin County, and the City of Imperial Beach) filed a lawsuit against 37 fossil fuel companies including BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, Shell and Statoil.

They allege that the companies knew about the impacts of their greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and failed to act. They are seeking compensation for the current and future costs of adapting to the consequences of climate change, such as sea level rises.

According to Shell, climate change should be addressed through sound government policy and cultural change not by the courts. Statoil pointed out that previous lawsuits of this type had been dismissed for being a political, not a judicial, issue.

On 16 March 2018, a US District Court ruled that California state courts were the appropriate setting for the climate lawsuits.  The oil and gas companies targeted by the lawsuits had argued that the matter should be transfered to federal courts.  The companies have six weeks to appeal.

In May 2020, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's decision to remand the case to state courts.

Sequenza temporale