abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

記事

2005年6月7日

著者:
Somnath Mukherji, Samar

Corporate Responsibility Twenty Years On [India]

In Bhopal, the struggle to seek justice goes on...It is imperative to delineate and clearly understand the jurisdictions of the domestic law, the corporations’ home country’s law, and of any other international bodies and instruments. The Bhopal gas leak case exemplifies the failure to define precisely these legal boundaries...[refers to Union Carbide (part of Dow Chemical)]

Part of the following timelines

Union Carbide/Dow lawsuit (re Bhopal, filed in India)

Union Carbide/Dow lawsuit (re Bhopal, filed in the US)