abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

소송 (대중 참여를 위한 전략적 소송)

2021년 1월 19일

Center for International Policy

상태: SETTLED

소송을 제기한 날짜
2021년 1월 19일
날짜 정확도
연도 및 달 일치
형사소송
적용 불가
Center for International Policy
Environmental concerns group
소송: 대중 참여에 대한 전략적 소송
법적 주장: Defamation
다음에 의해 소송 제기: Company
목표: 집단, 기구 또는 기관
제소 위치: 독일
사건 위치: 독일
Korindo Group 인도네시아 야자수와 기름, 다각화/대기업, 금융 및 은행, 벌목 및 목재, 종이와 판지, 부동산 개발, 재산관리 기업 응답

출처

In January 2020, Rainforest Rescue (Rettet den Regenwald, Germany) and one of Mighty Earth’s NGO partners, Center for International Policy, USA, have had to contend with a defamation lawsuit against them in the Hamburg Regional Court by a supplier to the Korindo conglomerate, a notorious Korean-Indonesian palm oil, logging, and wind tower manufacturing giant. The lawsuit is based on letters signed in October 2016 by Mighty Earth, Rainforest Rescue, and a coalition of other NGOs that addressed Korindo’s involvement in large-scale deforestation for palm oil in Papua, Indonesia. The lawsuit challenges some of the assertions in the letters and is demanding a retraction of those statements as well as seeking judicial penalties including hefty fines and imprisonment if those statements are made again. The first court hearing took place on 22 January 2021. We invited the company to respond; it did. A rejoinder from Rainforest Rescue is available here. On 21 February 2023, the dispute was settled based on the decision by a German court that the company could not sue the Center for International Policy.