abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

์ด ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ English๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์‚ฌ

2025๋…„ 7์›” 4์ผ

์ €์ž:
Matthew Taylor, The Guardian (UK)

Netherlands: Greenpeaceโ€™s lawsuit against Energy Transfer under EU Anti-SLAPP Directive opens in court

ํ˜์˜

โ€œโ€˜Legal bullyingโ€™: global protest rights on line in Dutch court case, say activistsโ€, 4 July 2025

The outcome of a court case in theย Netherlandsย could shape the right to protest around the globe for decades to come, campaigners have warned, as figures show a dramatic rise in legal action taken by fossil fuel companies against activists and journalists.

Greenpeace International is using a recently introduced EU directive to try to reclaim costs and damages it incurred when a US jury decided it should pay the oil pipeline corporation Energy Transferย more than $660m in damages earlier this year.

The case, which opened on Wednesday in Amsterdam, is the latest round in an increasingly bitter dispute between activists, journalists and free speech groups and big corporations โ€“ which campaigners claim are using more and more aggressive legal tactics to try to silence themโ€ฆ

Experts say these so-called Slapp [strategic lawsuits against public participation] cases are on the rise across the boardโ€ฆ

The hearing in Amsterdam is the start of what experts expect to be a long legal process.

Greenpeace is asking for all costs and damages from the case in North Dakota โ€“ which is ongoing โ€“ to be paid by Energy Transfer Partners, a Dallas-based oil and gas company worth almost $70bn. It had suedย Greenpeaceย alleging defamation and orchestrating criminal behaviour by protesters at the Dakota Access pipeline in 2016 and 2017, claiming the organisation โ€œincitedโ€ people to protest by using a โ€œmisinformation campaignโ€.

Energy Transfer did not respond to a request for commentโ€ฆ

ํƒ€์ž„๋ผ์ธ