abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

이 내용은 다음 언어로도 제공됩니다: English, 简体中文, 繁體中文

정보 제공

Samsung SDI didn't respond to NGO rejoinder on supply chain factory fire

"Samsung's own statement was that Aricell had no relationship with Samsung, but rather with S-connect, and at first the working group was confused, but as the investigation progressed, we realised that Aricell was not an independent company, and that all financial affairs etc. were managed by S-connect, which existed more as a business unit. Therefore, the working group and the family [of the victims] believe that S-connect and Aricell are connected".

We invited Samsung SDI to respond to the above allegations of links between it and Aricell (via S-connect), but it did not.

타임라인