abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

์ด ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด๋กœ ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉฐ English๋กœ ํ‘œ์‹œ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ธฐ์‚ฌ

2013๋…„ 4์›” 29์ผ

์ €์ž:
Michael Bobelian, Forbes

Supreme Court Could Redraw The Reach Of America's Courts

DaimlerChrysler AG v. Bauman, which the Court will hear in its next term, asks the Court to resolve a different but related question: can an American court exercise jurisdiction โ€œover a foreign corporation based solely on the fact that an indirect corporate subsidiary performs services on behalf of the defendantโ€ in the United States? The plaintiffs in the case have accused an Argentinean subsidiary of DaimlerChryslerโ€ฆof collaborating with Argentinean officials in kidnapping, torturing, and killing former employees of the subsidiary. They sued DaimlerChrysler, a German company, in California by obtaining jurisdiction through the automakerโ€™s American subsidiaryโ€ฆ[T]he justices could use the case as an opportunity to redefine the jurisdictional reach of American courts over large-scale corporations.

ํƒ€์ž„๋ผ์ธ