abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfiltergenderglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptwitteruniversalityweb

이 페이지는 한국어로 제공되지 않으며 English로 표시됩니다.

이야기

12 4월 2025

Tracking corporate shifts and exits from climate commitments

In recent months, there has been a noticeable shift in the corporate backing for climate commitments. The Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), which once represented a important collective effort by global banks to align their operations with net-zero emissions by 2050, has experienced a significant pullback. Several major institutions, including Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Citigroup, and J.P. Morgan Chase, withdrawing from the alliance in late 2024 and early 2025. In April 2025, the NZBA decided to ditch its Paris-aligned 1.5 membership target. Political pressures, particularly in the U.S., have intensified as the Republican-led administration and state attorneys general have raised concerns about the potential legal and financial consequences of such climate pledges, including their impact on financing for the fossil fuel industry. This broader shift in policy priorities under the new U.S. administration further complicates the landscape, as companies face increasing scrutiny and opposition from both policymakers and investors.

At the same time, other corporate entities beyond the banking sector have reconsidered their climate strategies. ​In recent months, major energy companies including BP, Shell, and Equinor, have scaled back their energy transition ambitions, reducing investments in renewables and refocusing on oil and gas development amid investor pressure and shifting market dynamics.

Most recently, the activist group Follow This, which paused its campaign for stronger emissions reduction commitments from major oil and gas companies in April 2025. This decision was influenced by declining institutional support and evolving political dynamics.

Nonetheless, resistance to the diminishing of climate targets has been seen in a couple of cases: Triodos Bank left the NZBA after the alliance dropped its 1.5 degrees target; almost a quarter of BP shareholders rejected the BP chair on the grounds of dropping the company's climate commitments; and in late April the New York Pensions Funds increased its demands on net zero targets to its asset managers.

This story aims to keep track of the most recent developments on corporate shifts and back downs on climate commitments, including changes in investor and asset managers climate-related strategies.

타임라인

개인정보

이 웹사이트는 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다. 아래에서 개인정보보호 옵션을 설정할 수 있습니다. 변경 사항은 즉시 적용됩니다.

웹 저장소 사용에 대한 자세한 내용은 다음을 참조하세요 데이터 사용 및 쿠키 정책

Strictly necessary storage

ON
OFF

Necessary storage enables core site functionality. This site cannot function without it, so it can only be disabled by changing settings in your browser.

분석 쿠키

ON
OFF

귀하가 우리 웹사이트를 방문하면 Google Analytics를 사용하여 귀하의 방문 정보를 수집합니다. 이 쿠키를 수락하면 저희가 귀하의 방문에 대한 자세한 내용을 이해하고, 정보 표시 방법을 개선할 수 있습니다. 모든 분석 정보는 익명이 보장되며 귀하를 식별하는데 사용하지 않습니다. Google은 모든 브라우저에 대해 Google Analytics 선택 해제 추가 기능을 제공합니다.

프로모션 쿠키

ON
OFF

우리는 소셜미디어와 검색 엔진을 포함한 제3자 플랫폼을 통해 기업과 인권에 대한 뉴스와 업데이트를 제공합니다. 이 쿠키는 이러한 프로모션의 성과를 이해하는데 도움이 됩니다.

이 사이트에 대한 개인정보 공개 범위 선택

이 사이트는 필요한 핵심 기능 이상으로 귀하의 경험을 향상시키기 위해 쿠키 및 기타 웹 저장 기술을 사용합니다.