abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

這頁面沒有繁體中文版本,現以English顯示

內容有以下的語言版本: English, 日本語

文章

2024年8月20日

作者:
Climate Rights International

Indonesia: Climate Rights International demands EV companies to ensure mining and smelting of transition minerals used do not contribute to human rights and environmental harms

"Minerals: Electric Vehicle Companies Failing on Rights and Environmental Practices" 20 August 2024

...

As Climate Rights International documented in its January 2024 report, “Nickel Unearthed: The Human and Climate Costs of Indonesia’s Nickel Industry,” communities living near nickel mining and processing projects in North Maluku, Indonesia, are experiencing significant pollution of their air and water, land grabbing, deforestation, and harm to their standard of living. Indonesia is the world’s largest producer of nickel, and much of the nickel mined in places like North Maluku is intended to produce batteries for electric vehicles. Yet, local communities do not always receive benefits from these projects. Adlun Fikri, a 29-year-old activist from the coastal village of Sagea in North Maluku, told Climate Rights International,

In the upstream area where they mine, it’s destructive, degrading forest, destroying forest, and causing human rights violations. The local residents here bear the cost for global ambition [of net zero]. Western people enjoy the electric vehicle, and meanwhile we get the negative impact. 

...

In April and May 2024, Climate Rights International wrote to sixteen additional electric vehicle companies. Only four – General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, BMW Group, and Renault – responded. Links to their responses may be found below. The other twelve companies have not responded, demonstrating an apparent unwillingness to provide basic information on how they ensure their supply chains are not contributing to serious climate, human rights, and environmental violations. The twelve are BYD, GAC Motor, Geely, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nio, Nissan, SAIC Motor, Stellantis, Subaru, and Volvo.

Climate Rights International asked companies how they ensured that the mining and smelting of transition minerals used in their EVs do not contribute to human rights and environmental harms. In the most recent round of responses, all four of the companies that responded reported having policies governing their suppliers’ conduct:

  • Renault stated that, under its human rights vigilance plan, which currently applies to cobalt and minerals from conflict and high-risk areas, the company, “continuously ensures the proper performance of reasonable due diligence and remediation procedures,” in order to be in alignment with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Fundamental Conventions of the International Labour Organisation, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Fundamental Rights at Work, and the International Bill of Human Rights.
  • Mercedes-Benz stated that it conducts risk-oriented raw material assessments for 24 raw materials, based on the logic and methodology of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, with the goal to, “proactively identify and mitigate risks in our raw material supply chains.”...
  • BMW Group stated, “As part of our due diligence for our supply chain, the BMW Group continuously monitors compliance with requirements through procedures such as risk filters, media analyses and with supply chain mapping, among others.”...
  • General Motors stated, “In the event of non-conformance with our Supplier Code of Conduct, we work with our suppliers through training and direct engagement to enable them to responsibly manage human rights.”

...

In order to ensure that their suppliers are in compliance with the company’s supplier code of conduct or other related policies, EV companies should:

  • Require direct suppliers to disclose their full list of suppliers, as well as require documentation that direct suppliers implement EV company policies  on human rights and environmental due diligence with their suppliers;
  • Conduct regular, transparent, and genuinely independent audits of mines and facilities where nickel and other critical minerals are mined and refined to ensure that suppliers respect human rights and the environment;
  • Increase transparency about EV supply chains by providing public information about all companies in EV supply chains engaged in mineral mining, refining, smelting, and battery production;
  • Set explicit, time-bound targets to decarbonize transition mineral supply chains and ensure that suppliers are taking concrete steps to reach those targets; and
  • Use leverage to push suppliers to address harms to local communities and the environment, and if necessary, stop sourcing minerals from companies responsible for such abuses.

...

時間線