Certain minerals (including tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold) have been linked with funding killings, violence, rape, and other human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo and other conflict zones. These minerals can enter multinational companies' supply chains, and are used in consumer products, including laptops, mobile phones and cars. In the past years, various voluntary and regulatory measures have been implemented to ensure responsible sourcing of minerals and stem financing of related human rights abuses.
In 2011, the OECD published guidance on due diligence for responsible supply chains of minerals from conflict zones, with a supplement on tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. This guidance has been recognised as an international framework for due diligence and has been referred to in the subsequent US conflict minerals law. On 22 August 2012, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to adopt regulations to implement key provisions of the 2010 financial reform law known as "Dodd-Frank". The US Dodd-Frank Act's conflict minerals provision requires certain companies traded on US stock exchanges to disclose steps they are taking to avoid sourcing certain minerals from mines controlled by armed groups that use the mineral sales to fund violence.
- 📄 DanWatch report on conflict minerals in Dem. Rep. Congo & company responses
- 📄 US Conflict Minerals Trade Act (2009) - Text & reactions
- 📄 Lobbying "seeking to undermine" Dodd-Frank conflict minerals legislation
- 📄 US Dodd-Frank law - reactions to SEC vote on conflict minerals, Aug 2012
- 📄 Implementation of US Dodd-Frank Act rule on conflict minerals: Commentaries, guidance, company actions
- 📄 Proposed EU regulation on conflict minerals: commentaries & media coverage
- 📄 Conflict minerals disclosure reports (Jun 2014)
Related stories and components
Commentary: Draft UN legal principles on corporate environmental conduct in conflict areas risk pushback from governments & corporations
Author: Stavros Pantazopoulos, Conflict and Environment Observatory
"New UN legal report addresses the responsibility of states and corporations for environmental damage in conflict", 21 May 2019....
Commentary: Despite increasing regulation, mining companies are still slow to seeking legal advice on social and environmental governance
Author: Fieldfisher, Mining.com
"Mining companies need to start thinking seriously about ESG - opinion", 12 May 2019....
Author: Fritz Brugger, African Arguments
"Blockchain is great, but it can't solve everything. Take conflict minerals.", 23 April 2019....
NGO report finds that most conflict in eastern Dem. Rep. of Congo not related to mining, warns that responsible sourcing initiatives could negatively impact local community
The Danish Institute for International Studies and the International Peace Information Service (IPIS) released an updated report and webpage analyzing 10 years' worth of data relating to conflict and artisanal mining in Eastern DRC. The findings...
Reuters claims billions' worth of gold smuggled from Africa to the UAE fuels conflict, violates human rights & endangers environment
Author: David Lewis, Ryan McNeill & Zandi Shabalala, Reuters
"Exclusive: Gold worth billions' smuggled out of Africa", 24 April 2019....
Author: Sani Tukur, Premium Times
"Zamfara Violence: Nigerian govt bans mining activities in troubled state", 7 April 2019....
DRC: Illegal gold mining in the north-east continues to fuel conflict despite conflict mineral regulations
Author: Deutsche Welle
"Investigating DR Congo's illegal gold trade", 8 January 2019....
USA: Securities & Exchange Commission to consider scaling down conflict minerals disclosure rule in Dodd-Frank Act
Author: Sarah N. Lynch & Emily Stephenson, Reuters (US)
"Exclusive: White House eying executive order targeting 'conflict minerals' rule - sources"...
- Related stories: US Govt. plans to review, possibly suspend requirements for companies to disclose use of minerals from conflict zones
- Related in-depth areas: Conflict minerals