Company Response
European Investment Bank (EIB) has not responded to
Road to rights: Companies respond to allegations linked to infrastructure projects in EECA
Part of the following timelines
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Highway funded by intl. investors threatens livelihoods, environment & rights of ethnic minorities; incl. co response
-
EIB did not respond
-
Western Balkans Investment Framework did not respond
-
Response by JP Autoceste
-
Run over by a massive motorway project, Mostar residents demand to be heard
Mostar residents were never properly consulted about the proposed pan-European motorway that threatens their livelihoods and nature of the Neretva valley. After a recent win in a discrimination lawsuit, they’re hoping that the controversial route around Mostar might finally be consulted with them and reconsidered.
View full story
Georgia: Striking motorway workers demand improvements to their working conditions
Georgia: NGO report highlights violation of land rights, inadequate public consultation & other deficiencies in impact assessment for construction of Samtredia-Grigoleti highway
-
Sinohydro did not respond
-
EIB did not respond
-
China Railway 23rd Bureau Group did not respond
-
Social and Gender Impact Assessment of Road Infrastructure Development: Case of Samtredia-Grigoleti Highway
-
Georgia: Employees of Sinohydro strike demanding wage raise and improvement of working conditions
View full story
Armenia: Corruption case revealed during implementation of North-South road construction by local branch of Sinohydro Corporation LLC
Road to rights: Companies respond to allegations linked to infrastructure projects in EECA
-
Eurasian Development Bank response
-
Response by Islamic Development Bank
-
Response by EBRD
-
China Railway Group Limited did not respond
-
Avtodor did not respond
-
Export-Import Bank of China did not respond
-
AzVirt LLC did not respond
-
China Road and Bridge Cоrporation did not respond
-
Western Balkans Investment Framework did not respond
-
Beijing State-Owned Assets Management Co., Ltd did not respond
-
Response by ENKA Insaat ve Sanayi A.S.
-
SK Engineering and Construction did not respond
-
Alsim Alarko Sanayi Tesisleri ve Ticaret A.S. did not respond
-
China Railway 23rd Bureau Group did not respond
-
China Railway International Group Co., Ltd. did not respond
-
Shandong Hi-Speed International did not respond
-
Granit did not respond
-
Bemax did not respond
-
Sinohydro did not respond
-
Mostotrest did not respond
-
Kazavtozhol JSC did not respond
-
China Xinxing Construction & Development Co. did not respond
-
China Railway Tunnel Group Co did not respond
-
World Bank did not respond
-
Cijevna Komerc did not respond
-
City Transportation Systems LLP did not respond
-
Bechtel did not respond
-
Bank of China did not respond
-
Opus Global did not respond
-
Vodno Stroitelstvo-Blagoevgrad did not respond
-
EIB did not respond
-
Victoria Invest did not respond
-
JV Akzhol Kurylys LLP did not respond
-
Georgian Raliway JSC did not respond
-
Makyol Insaat Sanayi Turizm ve Ticaret A.S. did not respond
-
Saudi fund for development did not respond
-
Hunan Road & Bridge Construction Group Company Limited did not respond
-
Longhai Road and Bridge Corporation did not respond
-
Assana DorStroy LLP did not respond
-
AIIB did not respond
-
Dutch pension fund PGGM did not respond
-
Avtoban did not respond
-
Response by Asian Development Bank
-
Response by Korea Expressway Corporation
-
Response by Japan International Cooperation Agency
-
Response by Bakad Investment and Operations LLP
-
Response by JP Autoceste
-
China Development Bank did not respond
-
China Railway Construction did not respond
View full story