Extractive companies have had adverse impacts on a broad array of human rights, such as resettlement of communities without adequate consultation and compensation; environmental degradation and its effects on health, sources of livelihood and access to clean water; as well as charges of forced labor, rape and even extrajudicial killings by security forces protecting company assets, with some cases meeting the legal definition of corporate complicity.
- John Ruggie
Natural resources are at the beginning of every supply chain. Their development is essential to the production of energy, consumer goods and food. This means that there are high stakes involved in their use, development and depletion. Natural resources can therefore be a great source of wealth for both governments and local communities, and bring benefits to all citizens. In practice, however, investments in oil, gas, coal, minerals, renewable energy, and large-scale agriculture are often entwined with human rights abuses. This is particularly the case in some of the world’s poorest – but most resource-rich – countries. Under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, it is the responsibility of the companies developing these resources, as well as their buyers and investors, to safeguard the human rights of workers and communities affected by their activities.
As Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege explained in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech:
We love nice cars, jewellery and gadgets. I have a smartphone myself. These items contain minerals found in our country. Often mined in inhuman conditions by young children, victims of intimidation and sexual violence. When you drive your electric car, when you use your smart phone or admire your jewellery, take a minute to reflect on the human cost of manufacturing these objects. As consumers, let us at least insist that these products are manufactured with respect for human dignity.
Related stories and components
Sierra Leone: Local community sues OCTEA for alleged environment destruction & compromise of livelihoods
Author: Mabinty M. Kamara, Politico SL (Sierra Leone)
‘Israeli company sued over operations in Sierra Leone’ 2 May 2019...
Zimbabwe: Local community opposes Chinese company Aihua Jianye's quarry mining project due to environmental impacts, company denies allegations
Author: Columbus Mavhunga, Voice of America
"Zimbabwean Villagers Resist a Chinese Company's Mining Project", 7 May 2019....
Author: Fritz Brugger, African Arguments
"Blockchain is great, but it can't solve everything. Take conflict minerals.", 23 April 2019....
Sierra Leone: Local population doesn't benefit from diamond industry due to corruption & smuggling, says analyst
Author: Julian Lahai Samboma, African Business Magazine
"Sierra Leone's diamond industry must be reformed", 3 May 2019....
InfluenceMap report alleges misleading climate-related branding & lobbying by major oil & gas companies; BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell & Total responded
In March 2019, InfluenceMap published research finding that the five largest publicly-traded oil and gas majors (ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP and Total) have invested over $1Bn of shareholder funds in the three years following the Paris Agreement on...
So. Africa: Labour department threatens to deregister giant mining union as '"it is no longer a genuine trade union"
Author: Alexander Winning and Tanisha Heiberg; Reuters
‘South Africa intends to de-register militant mining union AMCU’ 24 April 2019...
So. Africa: Sasol sued for lung related illnesses contracted while mining coal; Sasol denies any liability
Author: Ciaran Ryan, GroundUp (So. Africa)
‘South Africa: Former Sasol Coal Miners Claim More Than R80 Million for Coal-Related Illnesses’ 25 April 2019...
So. Africa: Tendele Coal Mining threatens to sue environmental activists for defamation over Facebook posts
Author: Daily Maverick, (South Africa)
So. Africa: Mining company threatens to sue environmental activists for defamation over Facebook posts...