Extractive companies have had adverse impacts on a broad array of human rights, such as resettlement of communities without adequate consultation and compensation; environmental degradation and its effects on health, sources of livelihood and access to clean water; as well as charges of forced labor, rape and even extrajudicial killings by security forces protecting company assets, with some cases meeting the legal definition of corporate complicity.
- John Ruggie
Natural resources are at the beginning of every supply chain. Their development is essential to the production of energy, consumer goods and food. This means that there are high stakes involved in their use, development and depletion. Natural resources can therefore be a great source of wealth for both governments and local communities, and bring benefits to all citizens. In practice, however, investments in oil, gas, coal, minerals, renewable energy, and large-scale agriculture are often entwined with human rights abuses. This is particularly the case in some of the world’s poorest – but most resource-rich – countries. Under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, it is the responsibility of the companies developing these resources, as well as their buyers and investors, to safeguard the human rights of workers and communities affected by their activities.
As Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege explained in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech:
We love nice cars, jewellery and gadgets. I have a smartphone myself. These items contain minerals found in our country. Often mined in inhuman conditions by young children, victims of intimidation and sexual violence. When you drive your electric car, when you use your smart phone or admire your jewellery, take a minute to reflect on the human cost of manufacturing these objects. As consumers, let us at least insist that these products are manufactured with respect for human dignity.
Related stories and components
Sierra Leone: Swedwatch raises concerns incl. pollution & land loss for communities impacted by bioenergy project; incl. co non-response
On 28 March 2019, Swedwatch published an article raising concerns including pollution, land loss and relocation from religious sites, with regard to new plans for community relocation following resumption of the Addax Bionenergy project in 2016. ...
Nigeria: Local community in Ogoni area concerned that clean-up after oil spill yet to take off 3 years on
Author: Benjamin Umuteme, Blueprint (Nigeria)
‘Is the Ogoni clean-up jinxed’...
Author: Esther Onyegbula, Vanguard (Nigeria)
‘FG should tackle oil theft, environmental degradation, insecurity –––NNF’ 16 April 2019...
So. Africa: Coal mines accused of causing diseases and cracks in houses; Anglo American & South32 comment
Author: Ciaran Ryan, GroundUp (So. Africa)
‘South Africa: Disease Haunts Mpumalanga Coal Town’ ...
So. Africa: Major banks pulling out of funding coal-fired plants due to environmental & social concerns
Author: Amanda Watson, The Citizen (South Africa)
‘Standard Bank joins banks not financing ‘dirty’ coal-fired power plants’ ...
Author: Public Eye (Suisse)
« Syngenta gagne des milliards en vendant des pesticides extrêmement dangereux », 15 avril 2019...
- Related stories: La commercialisation de pesticides dangereux interdits en Europe est au cœur du modèle d’affaires de Syngenta, selon un rapport ; avec les commentaires de l’entreprise
- Related in-depth areas: Agriculture Health Latest news on natural resources Ressources naturelles
- Related companies: Syngenta
Author: Josephine Chiname and Bridget Mafusire, Zimbabwe Environmental Lawyers Association
‘How can litigation contribute to Sustainable Economic Development for Diamond Mining Communities in Zimbabwe?"...
The London Metal Exchange (LME) announced on 23 April 2019 that it will be introducing responsible sourcing standards across all brands, requiring all metals traded on the exchange to be responsibly sourced from 2022 onwards. This announcement came af...