abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Esta página no está disponible en Español y está siendo mostrada en English

Ataque a defensor de derechos humanos

140 climate protesters

Fecha del incidente
1 Ene 2024
Exactitud de fecha
Año correcto
Desconocido
Grupo de inquietudes medioambientales
Acoso judicial o legal: Otro
Objetivo: Individual
Lugar del incidente: Reino Unido
DLA Piper Reino Unido Firmas de abogados

Fuentes

In 2024, law firm DLA Piper claimed £727,573.84, which covered multiple claims on behalf of National Highways Ltd. in the United Kingdom, against around 140 protesters who blocked the M25 and surrounding roads in climate protests. That sum was eventually reduced by a judge to £580,000, and a later settlement offer sought about £3,000 from each campaigner to end the case.

Adam Wagner, a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, said: “You might have a protester who, for the same action, is convicted of a criminal offence, has an injunction taken out against them with the risk of contempt of court proceedings if they breach it, and faces huge costs. It’s like triple jeopardy.”