abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Attaque contre un défenseur des droits de l'homme

140 climate protesters

Date de l'incident
1 Jan 2024
Exactitude de la date
Année correcte
Inconnu
Groupe de défense de l'environnement
Harcèlement judiciaire ou juridique : Autre
Cible: Individuel
Lieu de l'incident: Royaume-Uni
DLA Piper Royaume-Uni Cabinets d'avocats

Sources

In 2024, law firm DLA Piper claimed £727,573.84, which covered multiple claims on behalf of National Highways Ltd. in the United Kingdom, against around 140 protesters who blocked the M25 and surrounding roads in climate protests. That sum was eventually reduced by a judge to £580,000, and a later settlement offer sought about £3,000 from each campaigner to end the case.

Adam Wagner, a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, said: “You might have a protester who, for the same action, is convicted of a criminal offence, has an injunction taken out against them with the risk of contempt of court proceedings if they breach it, and faces huge costs. It’s like triple jeopardy.”